| User | Post |
|
11:06 am February 8, 2011
| RevJohn
| | |
| Admin
| posts 92 | |
|
|
I would further add -
that according to dictionary.reference.com, Deism does fit the definition of religion, whether we like it or not. The two highlighted words were added by me; the hyperlinks were already there. Deism has no ritual observance, as stated in definition #5, but the lack of ritual does not seem to exclude Deism as a religion, as #6 shows. Some may agrue that Deism is not a religion but a theological philosophy, however the meaning of the word religion includes the beliefs of Deism.
–noun
1.
a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.
2.
a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects: the Christian religion; the Buddhist religion.
3.
the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices: a world council of religions.
4.
the life or state of a monk, nun, etc.: to enter religion.
5.
the practice of religious beliefs; ritual observance of faith.
6.
something one believes in and follows devotedly; a point or matter of ethics or conscience: to make a religion of fighting prejudice.
8.
Archaic . strict faithfulness; devotion: a religion to one's vow.
|
|
|
8:10 pm March 22, 2011
| suzieqccr
| | |
| Congregant | posts 9 | |
|
|
Hello all,
Just found this site. It seems to have had a slow start in the past year (admittedly, I have not gotten to the other forums yet, so I'm judging purely on this one). Anyways, like many of you stated, I have also grappled with religion vs atheism. I was raised non-denominational Born-Again (although my family attended two Baptist churches when I was young). My natural inquisitiveness as a child led me very early to scientific inquiry, studying specimens in my own microscope at 8 years old. Yet, as a good little Christian girl, I was staunchly against evolution, giving my high school Biology teacher a hard time. As I grew older and learned more about science and evolutionary theory, I began to re-think things. My ideas are complicated and long winded so I'll keep it short. I feel connected to a higher power and believe in spirituality, but am also grounded in science and reason. I was interested in Unitarianism because of their acceptance of free thought, but a visit to their church left me disappointed. It was cliche and lacked substance. I also fancied myself an Agnostic momentarily. But, to be satisfied with the resolve that what is unknown can never be known strikes me as nihilistic. I think I may fall into the category of "deists who don't know it."
To answer the previous person's question (I'm sorry, it fell on page 1 and I can't see it as I type this, can't remember his/her user name…), personally, I think the "Church" of Deism is a great idea! It's not about dogma and ritual. Like the founder said, it's about fellowship and community. And also about equal rights for important "rituals" of society that we all participate in like weddings, funerals, etc.
Having been raised in the Church, and having "fallen away" (as they call it), I do miss the concept of fellowship and communion with people of like-thought. This is not to say I seek out people who agree with me 100% on everything. Far be it. But, I seek out intelligent, informed discussion with people who are open to seeing things from another point of view.
So, thanks for starting this site! 
|
|
|
6:20 am October 18, 2011
| TruthSeeker
| | |
| Acolyte | posts 1 | |
|
|
Greetings,
So I am in a period of flux and am interested in what Deism has to offer. I was raised in a Christian faith but found that Christianity's Claim was not valid under Jewish Biblical Text or Tradition, so I did the only logical thing with the tools that I had at the time (being unaware of Deism and Noahidism) I converted to Judaism. I am trying to figure out where I fit with my beliefs- Judaism, Deism or Both.
I believe in Nature's God but I am coming to the conclusion that Revealed Religion is not completely divinely inspired. Here is what I mean. God left his/her/it's metaphoric finger prints on creation and some aware indiviuals came to said conclusion there must be a Designer… in that light it was Divinely inspired. However I think that Humans- being the way that we are- needing to control eachother and ourselves from some of our baser desires- set up rules "from God" to codify natural rights. Rules meant to keep us ethical are not meant for the Strongest of us but the Weakest. (Do you really need to be told don't Murder or don't sleep with your friend's Wife?) This Codification is where things can go a little askew because it is where a people's culture, prejudice, greed, and Corruption can step in. Now don't get me wrong some of the rules were justified… Like a Ban on Human Sacrifice… that is good. However one has to question an order to kill innocent women and children in time of war of an enemy living in a land that you are claiming God gave to you…. which in itself can be seen as no better or even worst than human sacrfice. This is just an example of which there are many.
I have found that using revealed religion and ritual as a source of grounding is good as long as it does not get in the way of your God Given Reason- even Abraham Reasoned with God on behalf of Sodom and Gamora. Not so much with the whole sacrifice Isaac thing but that was an issue of faith. – Both stories I see as metaphores held in plain sight meant to stir the Idea of Questioning everything to include your God if something does sit right with you. Jews often debate things that would make Christians and Muslims a little uncomfortable in relation to God and the Bible. Look at the Tradition of Midrash. These are stories meant to explain certain things in the Bible such as the "duel creation story of man"- hence the story of Lilith came to life to expand on that notion (Jews can Never pass up an opportunity to tell stories with a lesson). With this tradition in mind one can logically come to the conclusion that much of the Bible is Midrash. More than a few Jews have come to this conclusion, to include my wife.
So what is Ritual as I understand it? Nothing more than an act to get the person or people into a certain mind set. It is this mind set that can be beneficial. If I pray to God or do another precribed ritual designed to get me thinking about Myself, Others and a Certain situation, my mindset will change and see (hopefully) the natural cues to change or address the situation. IE I may be paying closer attention and catch on to a good business deal that I might not have otherwise noticed if my concern was money for example. I know that these thoughts are Deistic in nature. However- I do believe that the Creator can and does to a certain extent through Nature or Natural Laws help out his creation to include individuals, while being careful not to run over Free Will- to which reason is only apart of. I don't know if you would call my beliefs purely Deist or if you would call it a Mixture of Faith and Reason. But I have a hard time with the thought that God would not answer his creation in a personal way.
Any thoughts on the matter?
|
|
|
10:29 am October 25, 2011
| Brother Dustin
| | |
| Acolyte | posts 1 | |
|
|
TruthSeeker said:
Greetings,
So I am in a period of flux and am interested in what Deism has to offer. I was raised in a Christian faith but found that Christianity's Claim was not valid under Jewish Biblical Text or Tradition, so I did the only logical thing with the tools that I had at the time (being unaware of Deism and Noahidism) I converted to Judaism. I am trying to figure out where I fit with my beliefs- Judaism, Deism or Both.
I believe in Nature's God but I am coming to the conclusion that Revealed Religion is not completely divinely inspired. Here is what I mean. God left his/her/it's metaphoric finger prints on creation and some aware indiviuals came to said conclusion there must be a Designer… in that light it was Divinely inspired. However I think that Humans- being the way that we are- needing to control eachother and ourselves from some of our baser desires- set up rules "from God" to codify natural rights. Rules meant to keep us ethical are not meant for the Strongest of us but the Weakest. (Do you really need to be told don't Murder or don't sleep with your friend's Wife?) This Codification is where things can go a little askew because it is where a people's culture, prejudice, greed, and Corruption can step in. Now don't get me wrong some of the rules were justified… Like a Ban on Human Sacrifice… that is good. However one has to question an order to kill innocent women and children in time of war of an enemy living in a land that you are claiming God gave to you…. which in itself can be seen as no better or even worst than human sacrfice. This is just an example of which there are many.
I have found that using revealed religion and ritual as a source of grounding is good as long as it does not get in the way of your God Given Reason- even Abraham Reasoned with God on behalf of Sodom and Gamora. Not so much with the whole sacrifice Isaac thing but that was an issue of faith. – Both stories I see as metaphores held in plain sight meant to stir the Idea of Questioning everything to include your God if something does sit right with you. Jews often debate things that would make Christians and Muslims a little uncomfortable in relation to God and the Bible. Look at the Tradition of Midrash. These are stories meant to explain certain things in the Bible such as the "duel creation story of man"- hence the story of Lilith came to life to expand on that notion (Jews can Never pass up an opportunity to tell stories with a lesson). With this tradition in mind one can logically come to the conclusion that much of the Bible is Midrash. More than a few Jews have come to this conclusion, to include my wife.
So what is Ritual as I understand it? Nothing more than an act to get the person or people into a certain mind set. It is this mind set that can be beneficial. If I pray to God or do another precribed ritual designed to get me thinking about Myself, Others and a Certain situation, my mindset will change and see (hopefully) the natural cues to change or address the situation. IE I may be paying closer attention and catch on to a good business deal that I might not have otherwise noticed if my concern was money for example. I know that these thoughts are Deistic in nature. However- I do believe that the Creator can and does to a certain extent through Nature or Natural Laws help out his creation to include individuals, while being careful not to run over Free Will- to which reason is only apart of. I don't know if you would call my beliefs purely Deist or if you would call it a Mixture of Faith and Reason. But I have a hard time with the thought that God would not answer his creation in a personal way.
Any thoughts on the matter?
For me the reason I don't belive God answers questions is because in general a request will have effects on more than just the asker. My belief is that even if God can answer he/she won't because it would be like choosing to let one of you children get what they want right in front of the other and telling the other they can't have the same. I pray regularly not expecting answers from God but because I believe it gives my soul some satisfaction by just expressing it to the universe and there for creating more permanence in my own thoughts.
|
|
|
2:37 pm January 23, 2012
| Mann
| | |
| Acolyte | posts 2 | |
|
|
Good day to all! I have been a Catholic all my childhood. I went through a period of devoutness due to being confirmed, attending mass at the Vatican of course with Pope Benedict presiding and a largly Catholic family with a Protestant grandmother. After talking to one of my friends, an aetheist, many days at lunch (I was in high school at the time) I began to realize I was not devout neccesarily due to my own beliefs but expectations of my family (not that it was anything bad intended by it and also didn't even realize they weren't fully my own beliefs). I had major questions about my faith before confirmation but never got them fully answered. I had been skeptical towards the validity of going to church and began to wonder if science is the underlying truth in the development of the universe after the moment the universe came to be. Now I am in college and taking a philosophy course, to make me ask the same questions I asked before when I converted. Perhaps I was deist and never knew it for years but I cannot say for sure. I also follow the principles of Buddhism, trying to be a better student of Gutama's beliefs. I find deism to be interesting and really meets my major philisophical questions pertaining to existance and the development of the history of it. I welcome debates as I feel any student should do so to really understand what is taught.
|
|
|
11:04 pm February 18, 2012
| Helena
| | |
| Acolyte | posts 1 | |
|
|
I found this site because I consider myself a deist, and I would like to attend a brick and mortar church, so I was looking to see if one existed in my area. Sadly, it does not. I was raised Catholic by 2 VERY devout parents. When my mother died, I was 10, and had a major crisis of faith. I stopped attending church, and my father, in his own grief, allowed me to handle it my own way. I never went back to any church, except through the catholic school I attended until high school, and then as an adult for weddings, funerals, quinceaneras, and the like. I was actually atheist for a time, then agnostic for quite literally decades, and have only within the last few years had experiences that led me to believe very strongly in God. I eschew Christianity, or any Bible-based religion, because I do not believe the Bible is the word of God. I have respect for Christians or Jews whose faith helps them to live good, moral lives, but I have found that it usually is just a vehicle for them to feel superior to others and most do not practice anythinf close to what they preach. Attending church every Sunday means nothing to me if you lie, cheat and steal, gossip, backstab, and hurt people every other day of the week. While I think there are some good lessons in the bible, and it CAN be a primer for a good life, it requires one to pick and choose what is valid (the 10 commandments?) and what is outdated (killing your children for disobedience, women are unclean while menstruating?). In my opinion, if the bible truly was the written word of God, who is omnipotent, every word in it would transmit cleanly and appropriately across time. It would not need 2 testaments. It would be applicable to all of humanity, of any era. I believe we all develop our own personal and intimate relationship with God. Morality is universal – Do unto others is valid, but I do not need the bible to teach me that. It is common sense. I have reached apoint in my life where, while I am comfortable praying to and thanking God in my own space, with impromptu words, I remember with some fondness the peace and ease of meditation I had in a physical church. I decided that I will be attending church again, to feel that closeness with God. I was hoping to find a church that was not Christian or part of an existing organized religion, but I have had no luck. Ideally, there would be a non-denominational deist church where people could go pray, on their own time, perhaps with organized services and especially songs, which were another enjoyable part of my Catholic upbringing. This space could be used to perform weddings and funerals, and to celebrate other rituals, but at that point, it'd be an organised religion, no? LOL Oh well. Thank you for providing this forum. Hopefully all of us will find what we are looking for. Unfortunately, I think we may have different goals and perceptions of deism itself.
|
|
|
10:09 am February 19, 2012
| Mann
| | |
| Acolyte | posts 2 | |
|
|
Your last statement was very true Helena. Desim is very unique in the sense that it is either you believe in only it or you're not deist all together. As stated before I follow the teachings of the Buddha and of the Dalai Lama (probably misspelled both of them), also those of Jesus of Nazareth. However all in all I consider myself fully a deistic Buddhist. I agree with the concept of Church considering how uplifting some songs can be at Church services at times, but on the other hand I had some priests who were older so would tend to ramble thus Mass sometimes got a little boring lol.
As well my beliefs include the concept of a deity that exists beyond which is fathomable and definable by man. I also am unsure of what exists after death however different deists look at it differently. I would agree with the concept of deism being more of a matter of philosophy. Considering however many associate aetheism with a religion, for all intents and purposes I would call deism a religion as well (some states also give recognition to the practice of deism as an established religion). Deism is not easy to understand at times and can seem a bit perplexing. It is rather a matter of how you see things. When you start asking yourself critical questions about the importance of the Bible, Church ceremonies, etc. and come to the conclusion divine intervention is questionable at best and are sceptical towards most religions and value reason beyond all else, you are on a road towards deism. Your beliefs in religious matters can be unique while keeping to deism. In short it is one of those religions that is much more broad and flexible in practices and beliefs, much more so than most religions that exist today.
|
|